GENERAL SCOPE OF
CLASS 14: Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated
therewith, not included in other classes; jewelry, precious stones; horological
and chronometric instruments.
1. SEARCHING:
Searching by coordinated class –
014[cc] - 025, 026, 035, 037, 040, 042, A, B, 200
2.
IDENTIFICATION ISSUES:
Some general wording is allowed in Class 14. The following wording is acceptable:
·
Chronometers
·
Clocks
·
Diamonds
·
Earrings
·
Emeralds
·
Jewelry
·
Pearls
·
Pendants
·
Precious metals
and their alloys sold in bulk
·
Watches
Indefinite and unacceptable wording includes the following:
·
Pins (unless the
applicant specifies the type of pin, such as lapel pin, tie pins, pins in the
nature of brooches)
·
Stones (unless the
applicant specifies that the goods are “precious stones,” “semi-precious
stones,” or “gemstones”)
·
Synthetic stones (unless the
applicant specifies that the goods are “precious synthetic stones,” “semi-precious synthetic stones,” or
“synthetic gemstones”)
·
Horological and
chronometric instruments: this is part of
the class heading and is too broad.
Applicant must list the specific items, e.g. clocks, watches and
chronometers.
·
Articles made in
whole or in part of precious metals:
the applicant must specify every item, e.g. clocks, rings, tombstones,
trophies, all made in whole or part of precious metal.
More on Terminology in ID’s
·
Goods made of precious metal:
items normally in other classes, such as cigarette lighters [Class 34],
will be in Class 14 if they are made or coated with precious metals. The Class 14 identification should
read: cigarette lighters made from
precious metal. The exceptions to this rule are flatware and cutlery, which are in
Class 8 regardless of material; dental gold, which is in Class 5; pen nibs made
of gold, which are in Class 16.
·
Timing devices” or “time keeping devices” are both examples
of indefinite language. Furthermore,
most timing items are in Class 9.
·
The identification of goods should accurately reflect the nature
of gemstones. A synthetic
gemstone is man-made and is identical in molecular structure to the natural
gemstone it mimics. An imitation
gemstone is man-made but is identical to the natural gemstone in appearance
only.
·
Watches and jewelry: if the mark contains the name of a precious
metal or gemstone, the identification must be amended to indicate that the
goods are made wholly or partially of the metal or gemstone named. An acceptable identification would be: watches made in part of platinum, jewelry
made in part of diamonds. If the
goods do not contain the metal or stone indicated by the mark, then
registration must be refused under Section
2(a) of the Trademark Act [see form paragraph Q22-2] and 2(e)(1) as deceptively misdescriptive
[see form paragraph Q31 and Q31-1 to 3].
This applies equally to foreign words that identify precious metals and
gemstones.
3. DESCRIPTIVE WORDING, THIS WORDING SHOULD BE DISCLAIMED:
·
Brilliant or trilliant
·
Creations
·
Original
·
Collection
·
Ideal
4. MATERIAL
CONTENT AND DECEPTIVE WORDING:
·
Gold
·
Silver
·
Platinum
·
Diamond
·
Ruby
·
Emerald
·
Pearl
·
THIS LIST IS NOT
EXHAUSTIVE
If a mark contains any of the above wording, then the
identification of goods must be amended to indicate that the goods are made
wholly or substantially in part of the material named. An acceptable identification would be: watches made in substantial part of gold;
platinum rings; earrings made substantially of silver. If the term is a separable element of the
mark, then the word must be disclaimed.
If the goods are not made at least in part of the material named in the
mark, then registration must be refused under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act [see form paragraph Q22-2] and 2(e)(1) as deceptively misdescriptive
[see form paragraphs Q31 and Q31-1 to 3].
This applies equally to foreign words that identify the material named.
5. GEOGRAPHIC
WORDING:
·
Swiss – clocks or watches
·
Germany – clocks or watches
·
Names of famous Swiss cities, i.e. Geneva – clocks or watches
·
Majorca – pearls
·
Columbia – emeralds
·
Australia – opals
·
833AL or similar number and letter combinations – the letters are
abbreviations for the Italian province of origin and should be disclaimed in
marks filed by Italian applicants or those having a commercial establishment in
Italy. This could rise to a
deceptiveness issue for applicants having no association with Italy.
If a mark contains the name of a well-known jewelry or watch
producing area and there is no connection between applicant’s goods and the
place so named, then registration should be refused under Section 2(a) of the
Trademark Act on the basis that the mark is deceptive. [See form paragraphs Q22 and Q22-1] In addition, refusal of registration should
be made under Section 2(e)(3) as geographically deceptively
misdescriptive. [See form paragraphs
Q32-5 et seq]
In re Woodward
& Lothrop Inc., 4 USPQ2d 1412 (TTAB 1987) (CAMEO held deceptively
misdescriptive of jewelry).
RESOURCE: There are many
terms that are descriptive of jewelry.
Many of these are surprising. An
excellent resource is “An Illustrated Dictionary of Jewelry,” by Harold Newman,
containing over 2500 defined terms.
6. SPECIMEN
ISSUES:
Since the markings are often
very tiny, stamping them on a piece of paper or metal for submission as a
specimen is acceptable.
7. Gold Stamping
Act and Stamping Plated Articles (15
USCS Section 297)
[Rare issue] This section of the U.S. Code forbids the words
“sterling” or “coin” to be used in conjunction with any word or mark usually
employed to indicate the fineness of gold, unless it is accompanied by language
clearly indicating that the article or part thereof is made of an inferior
metal.
Further, before any article of merchandise which is marked or
stamped to indicate that it is made in whole or in part of gold or silver or of an alloy of either is placed in commerce or
imported in to the United States, a trademark for that article must have been
applied for with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Since the only requirement is that an
application be filed, these applications frequently abandon.
8. Section 2(d) refusals:
In
Class 14, the Office has traditionally been more “lenient” with respect to 1, 2
or 3 letter or number marks for jewelry.
For example, if you were to search the letter G in Class 14, you will
find 42 registrations – all for stylized “G”s for jewelry or watches.
The
reason behind this more “lenient” application of Section 2(d) for 1, 2 or 3
letter or number marks is because it is the industry practice for jewelers to
stamp the trademark onto the goods in very minute spaces, such as the inside of
a ring or the clasp of a necklace.
Since there are only so many 1, 2 or 3 letter combinations available, we
generally accept the industry’s view that the marks will be distinguished from
one another based on stylization.
However,
this does not mean that registration of a typed mark over one or more stylized
versions for the same mark is acceptable.
This rule applies only to stylized
letter or number marks.